Rosario Dawson Takes a Serious Turn in âTranceâ

Rosario Dawson Takes a Serious Turn in ‘Trance’

From 'Kids' to '25th Hour' to 'Death Proof,' the versatile actress always rises to the occasion. 'Trance' brings her even closer to Oscar-nom territory

Kelley L. Carter

by Kelley L. Carter, April 08, 2013

Rosario Dawson Takes a Serious Turn in âTranceâ

Rosario Dawson doesn’t have as many choices as you might think.

Sure, her named is billed high on big-to-do films like Death Proof, 25th Hour and the highly anticipated Sin City sequel (due in October). But?

“I’m not the person, necessarily, who gets to say yes and no to projects here,” she says frankly. “It’s a beast of a town and an industry. But I do get to say whether or not I’ll fight for something.”

So what has she fought for lately? For starters: a role in Academy Award-winning director Danny Boyle’s latest, Trance. In this new film—opening this month—Dawson plays hypnotherapist Elizabeth Lamb, who’s hired to delve into the darkest recesses of a fine art auctioneer’s psyche. As she unravels his broken subconscious, blurry lines of deceit and truth transpire.

You know, the usual. talks with Dawson, 33, about the role, her career and why being a woman of color hasn’t crippled her one bit.

EBONY: Trance is a gritty crime film. Why did you want to be a part of this one?

Rosario Dawson: I remember reading this script and thinking, “This is not something to half audition for.” I can’t half pretend that I want to do it, and then if I get it, pull out. This is a serious project with remarkably serious, talented, wonderful people, and it’s not about wasting anybody’s time. Just from that very first reading of the script and going, “OK, am I going to be willing to go this far and do this?!” I was so compelled by the script and so compelled by Elizabeth as a character, it just seemed like, why not rise to the challenge? It felt like it would make me grow as an actor and as a person, and it definitely did.

EBONY: So what excites you about a script?

RD: I really like the idea of playing with things. I love watching movies. I love stories. I love people. So I really like to take on the challenge of making people think about the way that we communicate with each other. Do we really listen to each other? I listen in on conversations all the time. You can’t help it; you’re walking around and people are talking. And I go, “wow, so this is clearly a couple that’s in love,” or “these are two best friends.” And if this was written down as a script and a scene, would they have cast those two people? Would the actors have been wearing those same things? Would the locations have been like this?

This film is a risky movie. It’s not what people are expecting from him or any of us. It’s not a movie that you can guess the ending of in the first five minutes; it really is smart. So who knows if it’s going to work or not?

There’s so much that’s unreal about filmmaking. We try so hard to make it as realistic as possible, but everything about it is artifice, so why are we often so compelled to watch it? I feel like it’s the same reason we feel compelled to go over conversations we’ve already had and rewrite them. What’s the point of that? But you feel bad that maybe you didn’t have that quick response to something somebody said or whatever, so it’s just good for our brain to exercise, go over it again. It’s like we’re constantly teaching ourselves how to communicate. I love that that’s how we’re constantly trying to figure out better ways to relate to each other, to express ourselves. I get to do that for a living, and that’s amazing.

That’s a lot of what I get into when I’m reading a script. Do I want to go there? Do I want to put myself through that experience, and do I want to challenge myself to think like that and put myself in someone else’s shoes for a while? On this latest film that I just did, Gimme Shelter, I play a crack mom to Vanessa Hudgens, and it’s just really hard, really upsetting. I found myself grimacing for a full day after one of the scenes, because she was just such a violent and intense and angry person. It was so intense.

I really didn’t agree with her. I didn’t like her stance, her position on things, her logic, her excuses, her irresponsibility. But I put myself there anyway, and I said it as truthfully and honestly and earnestly as I believe that she would, and it was an amazing experience too. I’m burned out on it, I don’t want to do anything like that again for a while. But I’m just really glad that I didn’t step away from it because I didn’t agree with her.

EBONY: So you don’t always have to be the nice guy?

RD: I don’t always have to be the nice guy. Do I have to be someone likeable all the time? Do I always have to be pretty? Do I always have to do all these different things in order to feel justified and want to go there deeply? I don’t. I want to challenge myself and

More great reads from Kelley L. Carter

More Than a Pretty Face

by Kelley L. Carter


by Kelley L. Carter


Related Tags

rosario dawson
Stay in the Know
Sign up for the Ebony Newsletter